The official narrative rests entirely on the premise that the DNC’s server was hacked by “Guccifer 2.0” — a persona whose very plausibility as a Russian intelligence officer completely falls apart upon consideration of the enormous mass of evidence in absolute contradiction of this notion.
From the latest joke-indictment by Robert Mueller to the hysterical press-coverage of the Trump-Putin summit, the way establishment media has been acting over the past week has been apoplectic.
In part one, Craig Murray sets out the official UK government account of the events in the Skripal case. In part two, he examines the credibility of this story. Next week, he will look at alternative explanations.
The head of the Chechen Republic has ordered a universal DNA test to help identify and retrieve Russian children who had been taken to terrorist-control territories in the Middle East.
British Prime Minister Theresa May faces a possible Parliamentary probe for misleading MPs about the source of the nerve agent allegedly used to poison the Skripals.
In its constant Cold War-like histrionics over Russia’s alleged “election meddling,” the United States, whose own government data shows it has interfered in at least 81 foreign elections between 1946 and 2000, only brings to greater attention its own abject hypocrisy and bankrupt pomposity.
To say things have been a complete mess is an understatement of epic proportions. The amount of lies, revisionism, misrepresentation, and chicanery on display by those trying to promote and justify the US, UK and French strikes on Syria has been incredible to observe.
The Forensicator, who revealed last year that files published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were accessed locally and not hacked, has just published a new analysis, the first of three articles which will comprise a series centered once again on the work of Guccifer 2.0.
According to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), who visited Julian Assange at the London Ecuadorian embassy in August 2017, the WikiLeaks founder possesses physical evidence proving Russia did not hack the DNC. Assange has consistently held that the emails were leaked by an insider for the past 2 years.
Western claims of a chemical attack in Douma have been thoroughly debunked to be a false-flag staged event as irrefutable evidence and eyewitness accounts continue to emerge, and more independent journalists arrive in Douma to discover and confirm a gas attack never took place.